« Book Club in a Bag | Main | RIP Kurt Vonnegut »
April 12, 2007
Headline: LiB's Library part of OCLC WorldCat Local Project
My employer, the San Mateo County Library, is one of the few libraries that are a part of the OCLC WorldCat Local project through our consortium, the Peninsula Library System.
WorldCat Local is an overlay over our regular III catalog that will replace all the screens our users see during the search process--all the search screens, main results screen, etc. Users will still see the regular III interface for placing holds, looking at their accounts, getting PINs, etc. The results screens will show our libraries' holdings at the top, and underneath that, other libraries that participate in WorldCat that are nearby.
None of us has actually seen any part of the product yet--we're just going on what we've been told. We are hoping to see the product in action soon, and are told that we will see it before it is launched live on our site. This project has been a huge deal for our consortium and libraries, and none of us has been able to talk about it for months. I'm glad the cat is out of the bag, finally.
April 12, 2007 | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c511253ef00e5505201ee8833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Headline: LiB's Library part of OCLC WorldCat Local Project:
Comments
Sorry to hear III decided not to help-- I had hoped that OCLC's clout might have persuaded them to open things up a little. It seems like a short-sighted policy to me. The branch that doesn't bend is more likely to break, etc.
Posted by: Roger Hiles | April13, 2007
Ow! We don't want that.
I really wonder why a library organization (OCLC)would act as if transparency is a bad thing. Reminds me of the secrecy shrouding Google's contracts with libraries - left a bad taste in my mouth.
Posted by: Barbara Fister | April13, 2007
The secrecy was demanded by OCLC. III didn't agree to help with the project at all, which made it much more difficult, but I'm not sure how much I can even talk about that sticky wicket without getting fired.
Posted by: Sarah Houghton-Jan (LiB) | April13, 2007
Why the secrecy? Was it III or OCLC - or both - who kept the kitty quarantined? That sounds like Google behavior.
Posted by: Barbara Fister | April12, 2007







