« WHOIS becomes DomainTools.com | Main | NOAA Historical Weather Data »

April 19, 2006

Michael Porter's "Keep Up!" Class

Today I attended Michael Porter's OCLC workshop "Keep Up! Practical Emerging Technology for You and Your Library" at the San Francisco Public Library.   Karen Schneider attended the same class yesterday, and has a write-up on Free Range Librarian.  The highlights according to me...

Michael gave a really good description of the long tail: tying it to libraries' roles in providing obscure materials through ILL, eBay and Amazon (for merchandise), and the possibility of a NetFlix model for materials delivery. The issue of fines and charging definitely come up wtih that model, but several participants noted that their libraries are discussing the development of a NetFlix-esque lending service for their libraries. Viva la Bay Area!

He discussed the convergence and buy-ups of the various technology companies (Bloglines purchased by Ask.com, Flickr purchased by Yahoo!, etc.) and how various sites and services are cooperating with each other, resulting in big time convergence. Everything is connected. The library? Not so much.

He described the Sony Reader, and described how it's much closer to the printed page due to the way the display works: it's not being continually refreshed, it's a static image on the screen, and therefore much easier on our eyes. He also mentioned ePaper, a flexible display that approximates the printed page.

He emphasized the future of voice recognition in human-computer interfaces. Then we got to watch the oh-so-fun EPIC/Googlezon video.

Michael encouraged attendees to use WebJunction to find technology, planning, and programming information for libraries. My own experience with WebJunction has always been that the information is there (I'm often stunned at the quantity), but it's hard to find. Searching doesn't work well, and browsing is often a ten step process. Oftentimes though, I find it is worth the time to get what's there.

He then discussed the importance of social communities online, like About.com, Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook. He emphasized the "sense of touch" factors with these sites--the real feeling that you're connected to a community--through photos, messaging, invitations, etc. We looked at some libraries' MySpace profiles for ideas of how to fold libraries in to this space (including Thomas Ford & Hennepin County).

Michael showed us Flickr, YouTube (hey--use this to post your library's promotional video content!), and Blogger as a very easy way for libraries to create a blog presence. Michael also highlighted library and librarian blogs including AADL's blogging frenzy, ALA TechSource, It's All Good, Shifted Librarian, Library Stuff, Stephen's Lighthouse, Libraryman (hey, that's Michael's!), librarian.net, Open Stacks, Tame the Web, and *blush* LibrarianInBlack. Michael announced to the class that he likes my blog because I "speak my mind" and am "very opinionated." Ya think? ;)

Michael showed us Bloglines, which wowed several of the partipants. There were some well-deserved audible "oohs" and "aahs. RSS is customized information delivery at its best, but suffers from a confusing name. I swear--the person who comes up with a better name for RSS (My Yahoo! doesn't count) will make a pretty penny...or at the very least get my personal thanks.

Michael showed us Open WorldCat, including the "Reviews" tab for each item where people can add their own reviews.  This feature isn't being used much yet, but it's available (which is more than we can say for most library catalogs).  He also suggested that to search the full Open WorldCat holdings, you should do a Google site-specific search like site:worldcatlibraries.org AUTHOR/TITLE as a better way to look for Open WorldCat books than just adding "Find in a Library" or "Open WorldCat" to your keyword search.

Michael discussed virtual reference options, including web-based chat (like QuestionPoint) and instant messaging (including aggregators like Trillian and Meebo).  He gave the class some practical tips on things to consider about virtual reference before implementation.

I have to leave a little bit early (like right now), but congratulations to Michael for an uber-fabulous class. If he's coming to a library near you, sign up!

April 19, 2006 | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c511253ef00e55051fd3d8833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Michael Porter's "Keep Up!" Class:

» "Open" Worldcat and those frustrating reviews from Free Range Librarian
Sarah Houghton had a highly readable, far less stream-of-consciousness summary of Michael Porter's class, which she attended the day after I did. I note her comments re Open Worldcat: "Michael showed us Open WorldCat, including the 'Reviews' tab for ea... [Read More]

Tracked on Apr 20, 2006 9:25:33 AM

Comments

I'm just very happy to hear you're looking into it. Thank you for your work!

Posted by: Sarah Houghton (LiB) | April27, 2006

Sarah,

We've got to stop meeting like this!

Our search does look through full text--keywords are an additional piece of metadata that's searched as well. And damme, I still can't replicate your "Sarah Houghton" search problem--but I didn't get your article with a "Houghton Sarah" search, which of course isn't right. Plus our investigations after this exchange have uncovered some additional search inconsistencies that our tech staff is looking into more closely.

Search, feh! Anyway, thanks so much for encouraging us to take a closer look on this key piece of functionality--we'll be working on it.

Posted by: Joe | April26, 2006

Thanks for your response! I would suggest that instead of relying on keywords to index the materials on the site, use a full-text search. It's what users are used to. As long as you have a decent relevancy-ranking engine, that works just fine. Searches for my name "Houghton Sarah" and "Sarah Houghton" are still not bringing back my article. I tried both IE & Firefox, wondering if that would make a difference, but it didn't.

Posted by: Sarah Houghton (LiB) | April25, 2006

That's very helpful, thanks! I'm going to reply here because I think some of your readers will find this subject interesting, but if you'd rather take this offline feel free to squelch the comment and we can do any follow up by email.

Re WebJunction's missing search white box: ouch. That's a (not so great) design decision we made a while ago and do plan to correct as a part of a redesign initiative we're working on. Soon. Really. We promise.

In fact, we are eager to engage you and others in the WJ community to help us with that redesign task. Details to come...

Re your comment that "most topics people are interested in could fall into any one of these categories", that's a very valid point (e.g., "Technology Planning" is under "Policies and Practices": why there rather than "Technology Resources"?). We plan to address this too and will be looking for the library community's help with that as well.

At the risk of turning your comments area into a tech support forum, I do want to get it on the public record that search on an author's name should work (it worked for me using yours) and on any term that appears in the text of your article. If you're getting consistently different results let's talk.

We do have a keyword search capability but the metadata is very sparsely populated (one of a number of cleanup things we need to get to but haven't--we have plans for a more open interface that will allow users to help manage keywords), which is why terms like "IM" and other terms didn't yield results.

I know this isn't really the point, but we are adding your article to the VR section--when it was first published no VR section existed, and it should have been added when the section was created.

Posted by: Joe | April25, 2006

Hi Joe--thanks for leaving a comment! I'm glad to hear acknowledgement that the old search engine was bad and browsing is still really hard (mostly due to the fact that most topics people are interested in could fall into any one of these categories). But I'm having issues with the new one too. The first issue is that there isn't a search box available to me at all times. I have to click on the search button to search anything.



And at the risk of being ego-centric, here's an example of a search not working really well. I have an article ("U R the Best: Community Building through Chat") on WebJunction. It's about using instant messaging to do reference. I can search for "instant messaging," "IM," "sarah houghton," "virtual reference," and a number of other terms and not get this article back. Very confusing. Also, this article is under "Internet" not "Virtual Reference." Also confusing.

Posted by: Sarah Houghton (LiB) | April24, 2006

Hi Sarah,

I wanted to hear more from you about your experience searching on WebJunction. A few months ago we did a significant upgrade to that functionality and we are always eager to know how we can do better. I'm curious as to whether your comments are based on your recent post-upgrade experience or using the admittedly crappy search engine we had prior to that.

Re browsing our site, your point is well taken. (Geez, is it really *ten* steps?) Plans are in the works to address that too.

Keep up the good work--we do like to hear your thoughts about us and everything else!

Joe

Posted by: Joe | April24, 2006

Hey, thanks Michael! It was a fabulous class and I'm glad I got to be a part of it.

Posted by: Sarah Houghton (LiB) | April21, 2006

Yo, L.i.B.! Thanks much for posting your thoughts on the "Keep Up!" workshop. I always enjoy your posts detailing meetings or prgrams you attend and have always wondered how you might summarize this workshop and what you might highlight. Look at all the hyperlinks! Wow! For what it's worth, you've got my seal of approval. :) Oh, and your in-class input was really very useful. Thank you!

Posted by: Michael Porter | April20, 2006

Post a comment

*Please only submit your comment once. Comments are moderated due to spam problems. I have to approve the comment before it will show up. I will try to do it quickly.*
LiB's simple ground rules for comments:
1. No personal attacks, rude, or intolerant comments.
2. Comments need to actually relate to the blog post topic.